Devender Singh, PhD
Scientist
Ascension Texas Spine and Scoliosis
Austin, Texas, United States
Ashley Duncan, RN
RN
Ascension
Austin, Texas, United States
Matthew Geck, MD
Surgeon
Ascension
Austin, Texas, United States
John Stokes, MD
Surgeon
Ascension
Austin, Texas, United States
Eeric Truumees, MD
Surgeon
Ascension
Austin, Texas, United States
Morgan Laviolette, DPT
PT
Ascension
Austin, Texas, United States
Eva Moroz, BS
Research Staff
Ascension
Austin, Texas, United States
Qais Zai, MD
Resident
Ascension
Austin, Texas, United States
The relationship between T1 Slope and Cervical Lordosis (CL), much like the relationship between Pelvic Incidence (PI) and Lumbar Lordosis (LL), serve as indicators of not only spinal alignment, but also outcomes related to overall disability and pain. To investigate the effect of T1-CL on outcomes in patients undergoing multi-level cervical fusions, and to establish a normative value of T1-CL in this cohort.
Design: Retrospective study
Results: 356 patients from seven different centers were included. There was a strong correlation between T1 and CL (r=0.79), and positive correlation between T1-CL and SVA (r=0.76), ODI (r=0.62) and VAS (r=0.65). Patients were divided into 3 different groups based on the distribution of T1-CL data: Group 1, T1-CL < 34°; Group 2, 34°≥T1-CL≤56.4°; Group 3 T1-CL >56.4°. Group 1 had better alignment (20.6 mm), VAS (3.2) and ODI (32.6) as compared to Groups 2 (SVA 52.9, VAS 4.8, ODI 45.2) and 3 (SVA 70.4, VAS 5.4, ODI 47.4) at 2 years follow-up. SVA of Group 1 improved significantly more than those in Groups 2 and 3. There was no difference in complication and revision rates between three groups. Analysis revealed that T1-CL demonstrated a constant value of 21.7° (r2=0.68). A subgroup analysis with T1-CLvalue between 21.7° and 34°, vs. others revealed a significant improvement in alignment, disability and pian.
Conclusions: T1 slope and CL and are strongly correlated, and when a parameter of T1-CL is created, that value, in turn, is positively correlated with SVA, as well as pain and disability scores. Patients with T1–CL values (between 21.7° and 34°) were significantly better aligned and reported less pain and lower disability scores. A range of T1-CL between 21.7° to 34° may be necessary to maintain horizontal gaze.